SoluLab vs Existek: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
SoluLab (4.1/5) edges ahead of Existek (3.9/5) overall. SoluLab is the better choice for companies wanting AI development, blockchain/Web3 fluency. Existek is the stronger option for mid-market companies, Clutch-recognized offshore AI add-on. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
SoluLab vs Existek: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | SoluLab | Existek |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2012 |
| HQ | Woodland Hills, California, United States | Bucharest, Romania |
| Team size | 246–250 | 50–249 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Combines AI-native development with blockchain/Web3 expertise under one delivery team | 4.9 Clutch rating with dual Ukraine/Romania Clutch top-developer recognition and a $25,000+ accessible entry point |
| Pricing model | Project-based, dedicated team | Project-based, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $25,000+ |
| Primary tech stack | OpenAI API, LangChain, Python | Python, TensorFlow, AWS |
| Industries served | Media & Entertainment, Automotive, Education, FinTech | Healthcare, Oil & Gas, Education, Business Intelligence |
SoluLab vs Existek: overview
SoluLab
SoluLab was founded in 2014–2015 by Chintan Thakkar and Rajat Lala and is headquartered in Woodland Hills, California, with a team of roughly 246–250 engineers, data scientists, and AI specialists. The firm positions itself as an 'AI-native, Blockchain, and Web3' development company and reports having delivered 1,500+ projects across 15+ countries for clients including The Walt Disney Company, Mercedes-Benz, and the University of Cambridge (per company website; independently unverifiable at this scale). Its dual focus on AI and blockchain/Web3 makes it broader than a pure ML specialist.
Existek
Existek was founded in 2012 and operates with a 50–249 person team split across Bucharest, Romania and Vinnytsia, Ukraine, delivering custom software development, dedicated team staffing, and AI development services for clients in business intelligence, healthcare, oil & gas, and education. The company has been recognized by Clutch as a top developer in both Ukraine and Romania and holds a near-perfect 4.9 rating on the platform, with hourly rates of $50–$99/hr and a minimum project size of $25,000+. Its AI services page is comparatively general, offering less publicly documented technical specificity than boutique ML specialists in this list.
Services and capabilities: SoluLab vs Existek
| Capability | SoluLab | Existek |
|---|---|---|
| Custom ML Models | ✓ | ✓ |
| Computer Vision | ✗ | ✗ |
| NLP | ✗ | ✗ |
| MLOps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Generative AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| AI Consulting | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: SoluLab vs Existek
| Framework / platform | SoluLab | Existek |
|---|---|---|
| TensorFlow | N/A | ✓ |
| PyTorch | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | N/A |
| Google Cloud | N/A | N/A |
| LangChain | ✓ | N/A |
| Hugging Face | N/A | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: SoluLab vs Existek
| Criterion | SoluLab | Existek |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $25,000+ |
| Engagement models | Project-based, Dedicated team | Project-based, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: SoluLab vs Existek
| Dimension | SoluLab | Existek |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Media & Entertainment, Automotive, Education | Healthcare, Oil & Gas, Education |
| Best use cases | Company building an AI product with a blockchain or Web3 component needs a single integrated vendor., Enterprise wants a vendor with named brand-name reference clients for procurement comfort. | Mid-market company wants a Clutch-recognized offshore vendor with a $25K+ entry point for an AI-adjacent project., Oil & gas or business intelligence company needs custom software plus AI/ML from a single vendor. |
| Typical project type | Project-based | Project-based |
SoluLab vs Existek: pros and cons
| SoluLab | |
|---|---|
| + | Named enterprise clients (The Walt Disney Company, Mercedes-Benz, University of Cambridge) offer verifiable reference points, though the specific scope of each engagement is unconfirmed. |
| + | 246–250 team size supports mid-to-large engagements without enterprise-firm overhead. |
| + | Combined AI and blockchain/Web3 capability is useful for clients building tokenized or decentralized AI products. |
| + | 10 years of company history (since 2014–2015) under continuous founder leadership. |
| - | 1,500+ projects claim across 15+ countries is difficult to independently verify at face value. |
| - | Blockchain/Web3 focus alongside AI means clients purely interested in ML may be paying for adjacent expertise they don't need. |
| Existek | |
|---|---|
| + | 4.9 near-perfect Clutch rating with top-developer recognition in both Ukraine and Romania. |
| + | $25,000+ minimum project size is more accessible than large enterprise-only vendors like EPAM. |
| + | 12+ years of operating history (since 2012) with dual-country delivery presence. |
| + | Serves niche industries (oil & gas, business intelligence) less commonly covered by boutique AI specialists. |
| - | Publicly available technical detail on Existek's specific AI/ML methodology is thinner than boutique specialists like Neurons Lab or Provectus. |
| - | AI development is one of several service lines (custom software, staff augmentation) rather than the firm's exclusive focus. |
Who should choose SoluLab?
A typical fit: company building an AI product with a blockchain or Web3 component needs a single integrated vendor.
Combines AI-native development with blockchain/Web3 expertise under one delivery team. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Media & Entertainment, Automotive, Education, FinTech.
Who should choose Existek?
A typical fit: mid-market company wants a Clutch-recognized offshore vendor with a $25K+ entry point for an AI-adjacent project.
4.9 Clutch rating with dual Ukraine/Romania Clutch top-developer recognition and a $25,000+ accessible entry point. Minimum engagement starts at $25,000+. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Oil & Gas, Education, Business Intelligence.
Decision matrix: SoluLab vs Existek
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | SoluLab |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: SoluLab (Not published) vs Existek ($25,000+) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | SoluLab |
| You need production MLOps support after model launch | Both offer MLOps support |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Existek |
Use case fit: SoluLab vs Existek
| Use case | SoluLab fit | Existek fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Company building an AI product with a blockchain or Web3 component needs a single integrated vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Enterprise wants a vendor with named brand-name reference clients for procurement comfort. | Strong | Limited | SoluLab |
| Mid-market company wants a Clutch-recognized offshore vendor with a $25K+ entry point for an AI-adjacent project. | Limited | Strong | Existek |
| Oil & gas or business intelligence company needs custom software plus AI/ML from a single vendor. | Limited | Strong | Existek |
| Fixed-scope ML build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Ongoing model retraining | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: SoluLab vs Existek
SoluLab (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. Combines AI-native development with blockchain/Web3 expertise under one delivery team.
Existek (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need oil & gas or business intelligence company needs custom software plus AI/ML from a single vendor. If your situation matches that, Existek is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
SoluLab vs Existek FAQ
Is SoluLab better than Existek?
SoluLab (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. SoluLab's strongest advantage: named enterprise clients (The Walt Disney Company, Mercedes-Benz, University of Cambridge) offer verifiable reference points, though the specific scope of each engagement is unconfirmed. Existek's strongest advantage: 4.9 near-perfect Clutch rating with top-developer recognition in both Ukraine and Romania.
How do SoluLab and Existek differ in pricing?
SoluLab uses project-based, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Existek uses project-based, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $25,000+. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: SoluLab or Existek?
SoluLab is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between SoluLab and Existek?
SoluLab's primary differentiator is: combines AI-native development with blockchain/Web3 expertise under one delivery team. Existek's primary differentiator is: 4.9 Clutch rating with dual Ukraine/Romania Clutch top-developer recognition and a $25,000+ accessible entry point. They also differ in team size (246–250 vs 50–249), minimum engagement (Not published vs $25,000+), and primary industries served (Media & Entertainment, Automotive vs Healthcare, Oil & Gas).