MobiDev vs SoluLab: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: July 2026
Quick verdict
MobiDev (4.3/5) edges ahead of SoluLab (4.1/5) overall. MobiDev is the better choice for uS and EU companies that want an ML vendor with a dedicated 2018-founded AI practice inside a larger, established engineering firm.. SoluLab is the stronger option for companies that want AI development from a vendor also fluent in blockchain/Web3 integration.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
MobiDev vs SoluLab: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | MobiDev | SoluLab |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2009 | 2014 |
| HQ | Atlanta, Georgia, United States | Woodland Hills, California, United States |
| Team size | 201–500 | 246–250 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Best for | US and EU companies that want an ML vendor with a dedicated 2018-founded AI practice inside a larger, established engineering firm. | Companies that want AI development from a vendor also fluent in blockchain/Web3 integration. |
| Pricing model | Time & materials, dedicated team | Project-based, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | TensorFlow, PyTorch, OpenCV | OpenAI API, LangChain, Python |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Retail & E-commerce, FinTech, Manufacturing | Media & Entertainment, Automotive, Education, FinTech |
MobiDev vs SoluLab: overview
MobiDev
MobiDev was founded in 2009 and is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, with R&D centers in Lodz, Poland and Chernivtsi, Ukraine staffing roughly 400 engineers. The company extended into dedicated AI consulting and engineering in 2018 and was recognized by Clutch as the #1 Machine Learning development company in 2021. Employee-count sources vary — Clutch cites around 150, while company materials cite 400+ — so prospective clients should confirm current team size for their specific engagement.
SoluLab
SoluLab was founded in 2014–2015 by Chintan Thakkar and Rajat Lala and is headquartered in Woodland Hills, California, with a team of roughly 246–250 engineers, data scientists, and AI specialists. The firm positions itself as an 'AI-native, Blockchain, and Web3' development company and reports having delivered 1,500+ projects across 15+ countries for clients including The Walt Disney Company, Mercedes-Benz, and the University of Cambridge (per company website; independently unverifiable at this scale). Its dual focus on AI and blockchain/Web3 makes it broader than a pure ML specialist.
Services and capabilities: MobiDev vs SoluLab
| Capability | MobiDev | SoluLab |
|---|---|---|
| Custom ML Models | ✓ | ✓ |
| Computer Vision | ✓ | ✗ |
| NLP | ✓ | ✗ |
| MLOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Generative AI | ✗ | ✓ |
| AI Consulting | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: MobiDev vs SoluLab
| Framework / platform | MobiDev | SoluLab |
|---|---|---|
| TensorFlow | ✓ | N/A |
| PyTorch | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | N/A |
| Google Cloud | N/A | N/A |
| LangChain | N/A | ✓ |
| Hugging Face | N/A | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: MobiDev vs SoluLab
| Criterion | MobiDev | SoluLab |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time & materials, Fixed project | Project-based, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: MobiDev vs SoluLab
| Dimension | MobiDev | SoluLab |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Retail & E-commerce, FinTech | Media & Entertainment, Automotive, Education |
| Best use cases | Healthcare or retail company wants a Clutch-recognized top ML vendor for a computer vision or NLP project., Company needs geographic delivery redundancy across two R&D centers (Poland, Ukraine). | Company building an AI product with a blockchain or Web3 component needs a single integrated vendor., Enterprise wants a vendor with named brand-name reference clients for procurement comfort. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Project-based |
MobiDev vs SoluLab: pros and cons
| MobiDev | |
|---|---|
| + | Clutch's #1 Machine Learning development company ranking in 2021 is a third-party, verifiable recognition rather than self-reported. |
| + | Dedicated AI consulting/engineering practice since 2018, not a general software shop retrofitting AI onto its offering. |
| + | Dual R&D centers in Poland and Ukraine provide geographic delivery redundancy. |
| + | 15+ years of company history (since 2009) predates the current AI hiring boom, indicating organic rather than opportunistic AI growth. |
| - | Employee-count sources conflict meaningfully (150 on Clutch vs. 400+ on company materials) — confirm current AI-team headcount directly before contracting. |
| - | US headquarters is primarily a commercial front office; delivery is centered in Poland/Ukraine, which is standard for the model but worth knowing upfront. |
| SoluLab | |
|---|---|
| + | Named enterprise clients (The Walt Disney Company, Mercedes-Benz, University of Cambridge) offer verifiable reference points, though the specific scope of each engagement is unconfirmed. |
| + | 246–250 team size supports mid-to-large engagements without enterprise-firm overhead. |
| + | Combined AI and blockchain/Web3 capability is useful for clients building tokenized or decentralized AI products. |
| + | 10 years of company history (since 2014–2015) under continuous founder leadership. |
| - | 1,500+ projects claim across 15+ countries is difficult to independently verify at face value. |
| - | Blockchain/Web3 focus alongside AI means clients purely interested in ML may be paying for adjacent expertise they don't need. |
Who should choose MobiDev?
MobiDev is the right choice for uS and EU companies that want an ML vendor with a dedicated 2018-founded AI practice inside a larger, established engineering firm..
Clutch's #1-ranked Machine Learning development company (2021), with a dedicated AI practice since 2018.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Retail & E-commerce, FinTech, Manufacturing.
Who should choose SoluLab?
SoluLab is the right choice for companies that want AI development from a vendor also fluent in blockchain/Web3 integration..
Combines AI-native development with blockchain/Web3 expertise under one delivery team.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Media & Entertainment, Automotive, Education, FinTech.
Decision matrix: MobiDev vs SoluLab
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | MobiDev |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | MobiDev |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: MobiDev (Not published) vs SoluLab (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | MobiDev |
| You need production MLOps support after model launch | MobiDev |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: MobiDev vs SoluLab
| Use case | MobiDev fit | SoluLab fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare or retail company wants a Clutch-recognized top ML vendor for a computer vision or NLP project. | Strong | Limited | MobiDev |
| Company needs geographic delivery redundancy across two R&D centers (Poland, Ukraine). | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Company building an AI product with a blockchain or Web3 component needs a single integrated vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Enterprise wants a vendor with named brand-name reference clients for procurement comfort. | Limited | Strong | SoluLab |
| Fixed-scope ML build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Ongoing model retraining | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: MobiDev vs SoluLab
MobiDev (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. Clutch's #1-ranked Machine Learning development company (2021), with a dedicated AI practice since 2018.. It is best for uS and EU companies that want an ML vendor with a dedicated 2018-founded AI practice inside a larger, established engineering firm..
SoluLab (4.1/5) is the better choice when companies that want AI development from a vendor also fluent in blockchain/Web3 integration.. If your situation matches those criteria, SoluLab is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
MobiDev vs SoluLab FAQ
Is MobiDev better than SoluLab?
MobiDev (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. MobiDev is better for uS and EU companies that want an ML vendor with a dedicated 2018-founded AI practice inside a larger, established engineering firm.. SoluLab is better for companies that want AI development from a vendor also fluent in blockchain/Web3 integration..
How do MobiDev and SoluLab differ in pricing?
MobiDev uses time & materials, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. SoluLab uses project-based, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: MobiDev or SoluLab?
SoluLab is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between MobiDev and SoluLab?
MobiDev's primary differentiator is: clutch's #1-ranked machine learning development company (2021), with a dedicated ai practice since 2018.. SoluLab's primary differentiator is: combines ai-native development with blockchain/web3 expertise under one delivery team.. They also differ in team size (201–500 vs 246–250), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Retail & E-commerce vs Media & Entertainment, Automotive).
Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.