LeewayHertz vs SoluLab: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: July 2026
Quick verdict
LeewayHertz (4.2/5) edges ahead of SoluLab (4.1/5) overall. LeewayHertz is the better choice for enterprises that want AI consulting backed by a publicly traded management-consulting parent (The Hackett Group).. SoluLab is the stronger option for companies that want AI development from a vendor also fluent in blockchain/Web3 integration.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
LeewayHertz vs SoluLab: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | LeewayHertz | SoluLab |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2014 |
| HQ | San Francisco, California, United States | Woodland Hills, California, United States |
| Team size | 200–300 | 246–250 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Best for | Enterprises that want AI consulting backed by a publicly traded management-consulting parent (The Hackett Group). | Companies that want AI development from a vendor also fluent in blockchain/Web3 integration. |
| Pricing model | Project-based, retainer | Project-based, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, LangChain, Hugging Face | OpenAI API, LangChain, Python |
| Industries served | FinTech, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce | Media & Entertainment, Automotive, Education, FinTech |
LeewayHertz vs SoluLab: overview
LeewayHertz
LeewayHertz was founded in 2007 by Akash Takyar and Viresh Bhathia and is headquartered in San Francisco, combining strategic AI advisory with engineering delivery and proprietary AI platforms. On September 23, 2024, LeewayHertz was acquired by The Hackett Group, a publicly traded management consulting firm, giving it access to Hackett's enterprise client relationships. Reported employee counts range from roughly 194 to 300, and as with any recently acquired firm, prospective clients should verify current team continuity.
SoluLab
SoluLab was founded in 2014–2015 by Chintan Thakkar and Rajat Lala and is headquartered in Woodland Hills, California, with a team of roughly 246–250 engineers, data scientists, and AI specialists. The firm positions itself as an 'AI-native, Blockchain, and Web3' development company and reports having delivered 1,500+ projects across 15+ countries for clients including The Walt Disney Company, Mercedes-Benz, and the University of Cambridge (per company website; independently unverifiable at this scale). Its dual focus on AI and blockchain/Web3 makes it broader than a pure ML specialist.
Services and capabilities: LeewayHertz vs SoluLab
| Capability | LeewayHertz | SoluLab |
|---|---|---|
| Custom ML Models | ✓ | ✓ |
| Computer Vision | ✗ | ✗ |
| NLP | ✗ | ✗ |
| MLOps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Generative AI | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI Consulting | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: LeewayHertz vs SoluLab
| Framework / platform | LeewayHertz | SoluLab |
|---|---|---|
| TensorFlow | N/A | N/A |
| PyTorch | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | N/A |
| Google Cloud | N/A | N/A |
| LangChain | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hugging Face | ✓ | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: LeewayHertz vs SoluLab
| Criterion | LeewayHertz | SoluLab |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Project-based, Retainer, Dedicated team | Project-based, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: LeewayHertz vs SoluLab
| Dimension | LeewayHertz | SoluLab |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | FinTech, Healthcare, Manufacturing | Media & Entertainment, Automotive, Education |
| Best use cases | Enterprise wants AI consulting from a firm now backed by a publicly traded management consultancy., Company needs generative AI or AI agent development with proprietary platform accelerators. | Company building an AI product with a blockchain or Web3 component needs a single integrated vendor., Enterprise wants a vendor with named brand-name reference clients for procurement comfort. |
| Typical project type | Project-based | Project-based |
LeewayHertz vs SoluLab: pros and cons
| LeewayHertz | |
|---|---|
| + | 17 years of AI/software delivery history since 2007, well-established before its 2024 acquisition. |
| + | Now backed by The Hackett Group, a publicly traded management consulting firm, adding financial stability and enterprise client access. |
| + | Proprietary AI platform assets built pre-acquisition can shorten delivery timelines for common use cases. |
| - | September 2024 acquisition by The Hackett Group is recent enough that integration effects on pricing and delivery team stability are still unfolding. |
| - | Employee-count sources disagree meaningfully (194 vs. 300), so confirm current AI-delivery headcount directly. |
| SoluLab | |
|---|---|
| + | Named enterprise clients (The Walt Disney Company, Mercedes-Benz, University of Cambridge) offer verifiable reference points, though the specific scope of each engagement is unconfirmed. |
| + | 246–250 team size supports mid-to-large engagements without enterprise-firm overhead. |
| + | Combined AI and blockchain/Web3 capability is useful for clients building tokenized or decentralized AI products. |
| + | 10 years of company history (since 2014–2015) under continuous founder leadership. |
| - | 1,500+ projects claim across 15+ countries is difficult to independently verify at face value. |
| - | Blockchain/Web3 focus alongside AI means clients purely interested in ML may be paying for adjacent expertise they don't need. |
Who should choose LeewayHertz?
LeewayHertz is the right choice for enterprises that want AI consulting backed by a publicly traded management-consulting parent (The Hackett Group)..
AI consultancy now operating as a Hackett Group company, combining startup-era agility with public-company backing.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in FinTech, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce.
Who should choose SoluLab?
SoluLab is the right choice for companies that want AI development from a vendor also fluent in blockchain/Web3 integration..
Combines AI-native development with blockchain/Web3 expertise under one delivery team.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Media & Entertainment, Automotive, Education, FinTech.
Decision matrix: LeewayHertz vs SoluLab
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | LeewayHertz |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: LeewayHertz (Not published) vs SoluLab (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | LeewayHertz |
| You need production MLOps support after model launch | Both offer MLOps support |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | LeewayHertz |
Use case fit: LeewayHertz vs SoluLab
| Use case | LeewayHertz fit | SoluLab fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise wants AI consulting from a firm now backed by a publicly traded management consultancy. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Company needs generative AI or AI agent development with proprietary platform accelerators. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Company building an AI product with a blockchain or Web3 component needs a single integrated vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Enterprise wants a vendor with named brand-name reference clients for procurement comfort. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-scope ML build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Ongoing model retraining | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: LeewayHertz vs SoluLab
LeewayHertz (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. AI consultancy now operating as a Hackett Group company, combining startup-era agility with public-company backing.. It is best for enterprises that want AI consulting backed by a publicly traded management-consulting parent (The Hackett Group)..
SoluLab (4.1/5) is the better choice when companies that want AI development from a vendor also fluent in blockchain/Web3 integration.. If your situation matches those criteria, SoluLab is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
LeewayHertz vs SoluLab FAQ
Is LeewayHertz better than SoluLab?
LeewayHertz (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. LeewayHertz is better for enterprises that want AI consulting backed by a publicly traded management-consulting parent (The Hackett Group).. SoluLab is better for companies that want AI development from a vendor also fluent in blockchain/Web3 integration..
How do LeewayHertz and SoluLab differ in pricing?
LeewayHertz uses project-based, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. SoluLab uses project-based, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: LeewayHertz or SoluLab?
SoluLab is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between LeewayHertz and SoluLab?
LeewayHertz's primary differentiator is: ai consultancy now operating as a hackett group company, combining startup-era agility with public-company backing.. SoluLab's primary differentiator is: combines ai-native development with blockchain/web3 expertise under one delivery team.. They also differ in team size (200–300 vs 246–250), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (FinTech, Healthcare vs Media & Entertainment, Automotive).
Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.