LeewayHertz vs Andersen: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: July 2026
Quick verdict
LeewayHertz (4.2/5) edges ahead of Andersen (3.7/5) overall. LeewayHertz is the better choice for enterprises that want AI consulting backed by a publicly traded management-consulting parent (The Hackett Group).. Andersen is the stronger option for enterprises wanting AI consulting bundled with a very broad general software-engineering practice (.NET, Java, mobile, etc.).. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
LeewayHertz vs Andersen: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | LeewayHertz | Andersen |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2007 |
| HQ | San Francisco, California, United States | Warsaw, Poland |
| Team size | 200–300 | 3,600+ |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Best for | Enterprises that want AI consulting backed by a publicly traded management-consulting parent (The Hackett Group). | Enterprises wanting AI consulting bundled with a very broad general software-engineering practice (.NET, Java, mobile, etc.). |
| Pricing model | Project-based, retainer | Time & materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, LangChain, Hugging Face | Python, .NET, Java |
| Industries served | FinTech, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce | FinTech, Healthcare, Retail & E-commerce, Manufacturing |
LeewayHertz vs Andersen: overview
LeewayHertz
LeewayHertz was founded in 2007 by Akash Takyar and Viresh Bhathia and is headquartered in San Francisco, combining strategic AI advisory with engineering delivery and proprietary AI platforms. On September 23, 2024, LeewayHertz was acquired by The Hackett Group, a publicly traded management consulting firm, giving it access to Hackett's enterprise client relationships. Reported employee counts range from roughly 194 to 300, and as with any recently acquired firm, prospective clients should verify current team continuity.
Andersen
Andersen was founded in 2007 by Alexandr Khomich, with Alexandr Orlov as co-founder/CTO and Alexandr Grigoryev as CEO, and is headquartered in Warsaw, Poland with additional presence in Krakow. The company employs more than 3,600 in-house developers, QA engineers, business analysts, designers, project managers, DevOps, and security specialists across 20 office locations and 16 development centers, with a technology stack spanning .NET, Java, Python, PHP, Go, mobile, and front-end frameworks alongside AI consulting, machine learning, and data engineering. Its AI/data practice sits within a much broader general software-engineering portfolio.
Services and capabilities: LeewayHertz vs Andersen
| Capability | LeewayHertz | Andersen |
|---|---|---|
| Custom ML Models | ✓ | ✓ |
| Computer Vision | ✗ | ✗ |
| NLP | ✗ | ✗ |
| MLOps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Generative AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| AI Consulting | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: LeewayHertz vs Andersen
| Framework / platform | LeewayHertz | Andersen |
|---|---|---|
| TensorFlow | N/A | N/A |
| PyTorch | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Google Cloud | N/A | N/A |
| LangChain | ✓ | N/A |
| Hugging Face | ✓ | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: LeewayHertz vs Andersen
| Criterion | LeewayHertz | Andersen |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Project-based, Retainer, Dedicated team | Dedicated team, Time & materials, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: LeewayHertz vs Andersen
| Dimension | LeewayHertz | Andersen |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | FinTech, Healthcare, Manufacturing | FinTech, Healthcare, Retail & E-commerce |
| Best use cases | Enterprise wants AI consulting from a firm now backed by a publicly traded management consultancy., Company needs generative AI or AI agent development with proprietary platform accelerators. | Enterprise wants AI consulting bundled with broad general software engineering (.NET, Java, mobile) from one vendor., Company needs a large, multi-language development team where AI/ML is one of several needed capabilities. |
| Typical project type | Project-based | Dedicated team |
LeewayHertz vs Andersen: pros and cons
| LeewayHertz | |
|---|---|
| + | 17 years of AI/software delivery history since 2007, well-established before its 2024 acquisition. |
| + | Now backed by The Hackett Group, a publicly traded management consulting firm, adding financial stability and enterprise client access. |
| + | Proprietary AI platform assets built pre-acquisition can shorten delivery timelines for common use cases. |
| - | September 2024 acquisition by The Hackett Group is recent enough that integration effects on pricing and delivery team stability are still unfolding. |
| - | Employee-count sources disagree meaningfully (194 vs. 300), so confirm current AI-delivery headcount directly. |
| Andersen | |
|---|---|
| + | 3,600+ in-house experts across 20 office locations and 16 development centers gives it substantial delivery flexibility. |
| + | 17 years of company history (since 2007) with a broad, multi-language technology stack beyond AI alone. |
| + | AI-powered robotic integration line suggests genuine applied AI work beyond pure software consulting. |
| - | AI consulting and ML are a smaller practice within a much broader general software-engineering portfolio (.NET, Java, PHP, Go, mobile). |
| - | Reported HQ city varies between Warsaw and Krakow across sources — confirm the primary contracting entity. |
| - | At 3,600+ employees, clients should confirm they're assigned a genuinely AI-specialized pod, not general developers relabeled for the engagement. |
Who should choose LeewayHertz?
LeewayHertz is the right choice for enterprises that want AI consulting backed by a publicly traded management-consulting parent (The Hackett Group)..
AI consultancy now operating as a Hackett Group company, combining startup-era agility with public-company backing.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in FinTech, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce.
Who should choose Andersen?
Andersen is the right choice for enterprises wanting AI consulting bundled with a very broad general software-engineering practice (.NET, Java, mobile, etc.)..
3,600+ in-house experts across 20 office locations, giving it exceptional breadth across programming languages and delivery models.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in FinTech, Healthcare, Retail & E-commerce, Manufacturing.
Decision matrix: LeewayHertz vs Andersen
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | LeewayHertz |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: LeewayHertz (Not published) vs Andersen (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | LeewayHertz |
| You need production MLOps support after model launch | Both offer MLOps support |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | LeewayHertz |
Use case fit: LeewayHertz vs Andersen
| Use case | LeewayHertz fit | Andersen fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise wants AI consulting from a firm now backed by a publicly traded management consultancy. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Company needs generative AI or AI agent development with proprietary platform accelerators. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Enterprise wants AI consulting bundled with broad general software engineering (.NET, Java, mobile) from one vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Company needs a large, multi-language development team where AI/ML is one of several needed capabilities. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-scope ML build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Ongoing model retraining | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: LeewayHertz vs Andersen
LeewayHertz (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. AI consultancy now operating as a Hackett Group company, combining startup-era agility with public-company backing.. It is best for enterprises that want AI consulting backed by a publicly traded management-consulting parent (The Hackett Group)..
Andersen (3.7/5) is the better choice when enterprises wanting AI consulting bundled with a very broad general software-engineering practice (.NET, Java, mobile, etc.).. If your situation matches those criteria, Andersen is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
LeewayHertz vs Andersen FAQ
Is LeewayHertz better than Andersen?
LeewayHertz (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. LeewayHertz is better for enterprises that want AI consulting backed by a publicly traded management-consulting parent (The Hackett Group).. Andersen is better for enterprises wanting AI consulting bundled with a very broad general software-engineering practice (.NET, Java, mobile, etc.)..
How do LeewayHertz and Andersen differ in pricing?
LeewayHertz uses project-based, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Andersen uses time & materials, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: LeewayHertz or Andersen?
LeewayHertz is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between LeewayHertz and Andersen?
LeewayHertz's primary differentiator is: ai consultancy now operating as a hackett group company, combining startup-era agility with public-company backing.. Andersen's primary differentiator is: 3,600+ in-house experts across 20 office locations, giving it exceptional breadth across programming languages and delivery models.. They also differ in team size (200–300 vs 3,600+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (FinTech, Healthcare vs FinTech, Healthcare).
Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.