Best ML Development Services

DataArt vs Cleveroad: full comparison for 2026

Last updated: July 2026

Quick verdict

DataArt (3.9/5) edges ahead of Cleveroad (3.9/5) overall. DataArt is the better choice for regulated-industry enterprises (finance, healthcare) that need AI delivery with built-in governance frameworks.. Cleveroad is the stronger option for healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

DataArt vs Cleveroad: head-to-head summary

Criterion DataArt Cleveroad
Founded 1997 2011
HQ New York, New York, United States Tallinn, Estonia
Team size 6,000+ 51–200
Rating 3.9 / 5 3.9 / 5
Best for Regulated-industry enterprises (finance, healthcare) that need AI delivery with built-in governance frameworks. Healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice.
Pricing model Time & materials, managed engagement Project-based, dedicated team
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack Python, AWS, Azure TensorFlow, OpenCV, Python
Industries served FinTech, Media & Entertainment, Healthcare, Retail & E-commerce, Travel & Hospitality Healthcare, Logistics & Supply Chain, FinTech, Retail & E-commerce

DataArt vs Cleveroad: overview

DataArt

DataArt was founded in 1997 in New York City by Eugene Goland and has grown to more than 6,000 engineers across 40+ locations in the US, UK, Europe, Latin America, India, and the Middle East. The firm delivers data, analytics, and AI platforms for finance, media, healthcare, retail, and travel clients, built around Artisyn, its AI-enabled operating model that embeds AI agents and governance frameworks across the software development lifecycle, including regulated industries. Clients cited on its Clutch profile include Priceline, Ocado Technology, Legal & General, and Flutter Entertainment.

Cleveroad

Cleveroad was founded in 2011 and is headquartered in Tallinn, Estonia, with an R&D center there and additional delivery staff across five countries. The company has built more than a decade of experience in healthcare, logistics, fintech, and retail, delivering web and mobile applications alongside AI/ML solutions and dedicated development teams. Cleveroad was named to the 2025 Clutch 1000 — placing it among the top 30 highest-rated B2B service providers globally on the platform — though reported employee counts vary between roughly 50 and 200.

Services and capabilities: DataArt vs Cleveroad

Capability DataArt Cleveroad
Custom ML Models
Computer Vision
NLP
MLOps
Generative AI
AI Consulting

Tech stack comparison: DataArt vs Cleveroad

Framework / platform DataArt Cleveroad
TensorFlow N/A
PyTorch N/A N/A
AWS
Azure N/A
Google Cloud N/A N/A
LangChain N/A N/A
Hugging Face N/A N/A
Kubernetes N/A

Pricing comparison: DataArt vs Cleveroad

Criterion DataArt Cleveroad
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Managed engagement, Time & materials, Dedicated team Project-based, Dedicated team, Fixed project
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: DataArt vs Cleveroad

Dimension DataArt Cleveroad
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries FinTech, Media & Entertainment, Healthcare Healthcare, Logistics & Supply Chain, FinTech
Best use cases Regulated financial services or healthcare company needs AI delivery with a built-in governance framework., Enterprise wants a vendor with named, publicly referenceable clients like Priceline and Legal & General. Healthcare or logistics company wants an AI feature built by a Clutch 1000-recognized full-stack development firm., Fintech startup needs both application development and ML modeling from a single Estonia-based vendor.
Typical project type Managed engagement Project-based

DataArt vs Cleveroad: pros and cons

DataArt
+ Named enterprise clients (Priceline, Ocado Technology, Legal & General, Flutter Entertainment) are independently verifiable via public case studies.
+ 27+ years of operating history (since 1997) gives it one of the longer track records in this list.
+ Artisyn operating model specifically addresses AI governance for regulated industries like financial services and healthcare, a genuine differentiator.
+ 6,000+ engineers across 40+ global locations provide substantial delivery capacity and geographic flexibility.
- At 6,000+ employees, engagements are structured around managed delivery rather than close founder-level involvement.
- AI/ML is one of several core service lines (alongside broader data/analytics platform work), not the firm's exclusive focus.
Cleveroad
+ 2025 Clutch 1000 placement (top 30 highest-rated global B2B providers) is a strong, independently verified distinction.
+ 13+ years of operating history (since 2011) with consistent focus on healthcare, logistics, and fintech verticals.
+ AI-assisted development services line reflects the firm keeping pace with modern AI-augmented delivery practices, not just AI as a client-facing product line.
- Employee-count sources conflict meaningfully (50 vs. 51–200), so confirm current AI-specific team size before contracting.
- AI/ML is one of several service lines (alongside general web/mobile development) rather than the firm's primary identity.

Who should choose DataArt?

DataArt is the right choice for regulated-industry enterprises (finance, healthcare) that need AI delivery with built-in governance frameworks..

Artisyn, a proprietary AI-enabled operating model embedding governance and AI agents across the delivery lifecycle.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in FinTech, Media & Entertainment, Healthcare, Retail & E-commerce, Travel & Hospitality.

Who should choose Cleveroad?

Cleveroad is the right choice for healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice..

Named to the 2025 Clutch 1000, placing it in the global top 30 highest-rated B2B service providers on the platform.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Logistics & Supply Chain, FinTech, Retail & E-commerce.

Decision matrix: DataArt vs Cleveroad

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Cleveroad
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme DataArt
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: DataArt (Not published) vs Cleveroad (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical DataArt
You need production MLOps support after model launch Both offer MLOps support
You need consulting before committing to a build DataArt

Use case fit: DataArt vs Cleveroad

Use case DataArt fit Cleveroad fit Winner
Regulated financial services or healthcare company needs AI delivery with a built-in governance framework. Strong Limited DataArt
Enterprise wants a vendor with named, publicly referenceable clients like Priceline and Legal & General. Strong Limited DataArt
Healthcare or logistics company wants an AI feature built by a Clutch 1000-recognized full-stack development firm. Strong Strong Both equally
Fintech startup needs both application development and ML modeling from a single Estonia-based vendor. Limited Strong Cleveroad
Fixed-scope ML build Limited Limited Both equally
Ongoing model retraining Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: DataArt vs Cleveroad

DataArt (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. Artisyn, a proprietary AI-enabled operating model embedding governance and AI agents across the delivery lifecycle.. It is best for regulated-industry enterprises (finance, healthcare) that need AI delivery with built-in governance frameworks..

Cleveroad (3.9/5) is the better choice when healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice.. If your situation matches those criteria, Cleveroad is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

DataArt vs Cleveroad FAQ

Is DataArt better than Cleveroad?

DataArt (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. DataArt is better for regulated-industry enterprises (finance, healthcare) that need AI delivery with built-in governance frameworks.. Cleveroad is better for healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice..

How do DataArt and Cleveroad differ in pricing?

DataArt uses time & materials, managed engagement pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Cleveroad uses project-based, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: DataArt or Cleveroad?

Cleveroad is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between DataArt and Cleveroad?

DataArt's primary differentiator is: artisyn, a proprietary ai-enabled operating model embedding governance and ai agents across the delivery lifecycle.. Cleveroad's primary differentiator is: named to the 2025 clutch 1000, placing it in the global top 30 highest-rated b2b service providers on the platform.. They also differ in team size (6,000+ vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (FinTech, Media & Entertainment vs Healthcare, Logistics & Supply Chain).

Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.