Cleveroad vs Andersen: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: July 2026
Quick verdict
Cleveroad (3.9/5) edges ahead of Andersen (3.7/5) overall. Cleveroad is the better choice for healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice.. Andersen is the stronger option for enterprises wanting AI consulting bundled with a very broad general software-engineering practice (.NET, Java, mobile, etc.).. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Cleveroad vs Andersen: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Cleveroad | Andersen |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2011 | 2007 |
| HQ | Tallinn, Estonia | Warsaw, Poland |
| Team size | 51–200 | 3,600+ |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Best for | Healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice. | Enterprises wanting AI consulting bundled with a very broad general software-engineering practice (.NET, Java, mobile, etc.). |
| Pricing model | Project-based, dedicated team | Time & materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | TensorFlow, OpenCV, Python | Python, .NET, Java |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Logistics & Supply Chain, FinTech, Retail & E-commerce | FinTech, Healthcare, Retail & E-commerce, Manufacturing |
Cleveroad vs Andersen: overview
Cleveroad
Cleveroad was founded in 2011 and is headquartered in Tallinn, Estonia, with an R&D center there and additional delivery staff across five countries. The company has built more than a decade of experience in healthcare, logistics, fintech, and retail, delivering web and mobile applications alongside AI/ML solutions and dedicated development teams. Cleveroad was named to the 2025 Clutch 1000 — placing it among the top 30 highest-rated B2B service providers globally on the platform — though reported employee counts vary between roughly 50 and 200.
Andersen
Andersen was founded in 2007 by Alexandr Khomich, with Alexandr Orlov as co-founder/CTO and Alexandr Grigoryev as CEO, and is headquartered in Warsaw, Poland with additional presence in Krakow. The company employs more than 3,600 in-house developers, QA engineers, business analysts, designers, project managers, DevOps, and security specialists across 20 office locations and 16 development centers, with a technology stack spanning .NET, Java, Python, PHP, Go, mobile, and front-end frameworks alongside AI consulting, machine learning, and data engineering. Its AI/data practice sits within a much broader general software-engineering portfolio.
Services and capabilities: Cleveroad vs Andersen
| Capability | Cleveroad | Andersen |
|---|---|---|
| Custom ML Models | ✓ | ✓ |
| Computer Vision | ✓ | ✗ |
| NLP | ✗ | ✗ |
| MLOps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Generative AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| AI Consulting | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Cleveroad vs Andersen
| Framework / platform | Cleveroad | Andersen |
|---|---|---|
| TensorFlow | ✓ | N/A |
| PyTorch | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Google Cloud | N/A | N/A |
| LangChain | N/A | N/A |
| Hugging Face | N/A | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Cleveroad vs Andersen
| Criterion | Cleveroad | Andersen |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Project-based, Dedicated team, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Time & materials, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Cleveroad vs Andersen
| Dimension | Cleveroad | Andersen |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Logistics & Supply Chain, FinTech | FinTech, Healthcare, Retail & E-commerce |
| Best use cases | Healthcare or logistics company wants an AI feature built by a Clutch 1000-recognized full-stack development firm., Fintech startup needs both application development and ML modeling from a single Estonia-based vendor. | Enterprise wants AI consulting bundled with broad general software engineering (.NET, Java, mobile) from one vendor., Company needs a large, multi-language development team where AI/ML is one of several needed capabilities. |
| Typical project type | Project-based | Dedicated team |
Cleveroad vs Andersen: pros and cons
| Cleveroad | |
|---|---|
| + | 2025 Clutch 1000 placement (top 30 highest-rated global B2B providers) is a strong, independently verified distinction. |
| + | 13+ years of operating history (since 2011) with consistent focus on healthcare, logistics, and fintech verticals. |
| + | AI-assisted development services line reflects the firm keeping pace with modern AI-augmented delivery practices, not just AI as a client-facing product line. |
| - | Employee-count sources conflict meaningfully (50 vs. 51–200), so confirm current AI-specific team size before contracting. |
| - | AI/ML is one of several service lines (alongside general web/mobile development) rather than the firm's primary identity. |
| Andersen | |
|---|---|
| + | 3,600+ in-house experts across 20 office locations and 16 development centers gives it substantial delivery flexibility. |
| + | 17 years of company history (since 2007) with a broad, multi-language technology stack beyond AI alone. |
| + | AI-powered robotic integration line suggests genuine applied AI work beyond pure software consulting. |
| - | AI consulting and ML are a smaller practice within a much broader general software-engineering portfolio (.NET, Java, PHP, Go, mobile). |
| - | Reported HQ city varies between Warsaw and Krakow across sources — confirm the primary contracting entity. |
| - | At 3,600+ employees, clients should confirm they're assigned a genuinely AI-specialized pod, not general developers relabeled for the engagement. |
Who should choose Cleveroad?
Cleveroad is the right choice for healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice..
Named to the 2025 Clutch 1000, placing it in the global top 30 highest-rated B2B service providers on the platform.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Logistics & Supply Chain, FinTech, Retail & E-commerce.
Who should choose Andersen?
Andersen is the right choice for enterprises wanting AI consulting bundled with a very broad general software-engineering practice (.NET, Java, mobile, etc.)..
3,600+ in-house experts across 20 office locations, giving it exceptional breadth across programming languages and delivery models.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in FinTech, Healthcare, Retail & E-commerce, Manufacturing.
Decision matrix: Cleveroad vs Andersen
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Cleveroad |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Cleveroad |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Cleveroad (Not published) vs Andersen (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Cleveroad |
| You need production MLOps support after model launch | Both offer MLOps support |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Andersen |
Use case fit: Cleveroad vs Andersen
| Use case | Cleveroad fit | Andersen fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare or logistics company wants an AI feature built by a Clutch 1000-recognized full-stack development firm. | Strong | Limited | Cleveroad |
| Fintech startup needs both application development and ML modeling from a single Estonia-based vendor. | Strong | Limited | Cleveroad |
| Enterprise wants AI consulting bundled with broad general software engineering (.NET, Java, mobile) from one vendor. | Limited | Strong | Andersen |
| Company needs a large, multi-language development team where AI/ML is one of several needed capabilities. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-scope ML build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Ongoing model retraining | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Cleveroad vs Andersen
Cleveroad (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. Named to the 2025 Clutch 1000, placing it in the global top 30 highest-rated B2B service providers on the platform.. It is best for healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice..
Andersen (3.7/5) is the better choice when enterprises wanting AI consulting bundled with a very broad general software-engineering practice (.NET, Java, mobile, etc.).. If your situation matches those criteria, Andersen is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Cleveroad vs Andersen FAQ
Is Cleveroad better than Andersen?
Cleveroad (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Cleveroad is better for healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice.. Andersen is better for enterprises wanting AI consulting bundled with a very broad general software-engineering practice (.NET, Java, mobile, etc.)..
How do Cleveroad and Andersen differ in pricing?
Cleveroad uses project-based, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Andersen uses time & materials, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Cleveroad or Andersen?
Cleveroad is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Cleveroad and Andersen?
Cleveroad's primary differentiator is: named to the 2025 clutch 1000, placing it in the global top 30 highest-rated b2b service providers on the platform.. Andersen's primary differentiator is: 3,600+ in-house experts across 20 office locations, giving it exceptional breadth across programming languages and delivery models.. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 3,600+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Logistics & Supply Chain vs FinTech, Healthcare).
Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.