Addepto vs Andersen: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: July 2026
Quick verdict
Addepto (4.3/5) edges ahead of Andersen (3.7/5) overall. Addepto is the better choice for companies seeking a Forbes/Deloitte-recognized AI consultancy, provided they factor in post-acquisition integration risk.. Andersen is the stronger option for enterprises wanting AI consulting bundled with a very broad general software-engineering practice (.NET, Java, mobile, etc.).. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Addepto vs Andersen: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Addepto | Andersen |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 2007 |
| HQ | Warsaw, Poland | Warsaw, Poland |
| Team size | 50–100 | 3,600+ |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Best for | Companies seeking a Forbes/Deloitte-recognized AI consultancy, provided they factor in post-acquisition integration risk. | Enterprises wanting AI consulting bundled with a very broad general software-engineering practice (.NET, Java, mobile, etc.). |
| Pricing model | Project-based, consulting retainer | Time & materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, TensorFlow, AWS | Python, .NET, Java |
| Industries served | FinTech, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce | FinTech, Healthcare, Retail & E-commerce, Manufacturing |
Addepto vs Andersen: overview
Addepto
Addepto was founded in Warsaw in 2018 by Data Science enthusiasts Edwin Lisowski and Artur Haponik, delivering AI consulting and data-driven solutions recognized by Forbes, Deloitte, and the Financial Times. In December 2025, Addepto was acquired by KMS Technology, and prospective clients should confirm how delivery teams, pricing, and leadership continuity have changed post-acquisition. Reported employee counts vary from roughly 11–50 to 72, reflecting the transition period around the acquisition.
Andersen
Andersen was founded in 2007 by Alexandr Khomich, with Alexandr Orlov as co-founder/CTO and Alexandr Grigoryev as CEO, and is headquartered in Warsaw, Poland with additional presence in Krakow. The company employs more than 3,600 in-house developers, QA engineers, business analysts, designers, project managers, DevOps, and security specialists across 20 office locations and 16 development centers, with a technology stack spanning .NET, Java, Python, PHP, Go, mobile, and front-end frameworks alongside AI consulting, machine learning, and data engineering. Its AI/data practice sits within a much broader general software-engineering portfolio.
Services and capabilities: Addepto vs Andersen
| Capability | Addepto | Andersen |
|---|---|---|
| Custom ML Models | ✓ | ✓ |
| Computer Vision | ✗ | ✗ |
| NLP | ✗ | ✗ |
| MLOps | ✗ | ✗ |
| Generative AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| AI Consulting | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Addepto vs Andersen
| Framework / platform | Addepto | Andersen |
|---|---|---|
| TensorFlow | ✓ | N/A |
| PyTorch | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Google Cloud | N/A | N/A |
| LangChain | N/A | N/A |
| Hugging Face | N/A | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Addepto vs Andersen
| Criterion | Addepto | Andersen |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Project-based, Consulting retainer | Dedicated team, Time & materials, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Addepto vs Andersen
| Dimension | Addepto | Andersen |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | FinTech, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce | FinTech, Healthcare, Retail & E-commerce |
| Best use cases | Company wants an AI consultancy with independent press recognition for vendor due diligence., Client is comfortable evaluating a firm mid-acquisition and confirming continuity directly before signing. | Enterprise wants AI consulting bundled with broad general software engineering (.NET, Java, mobile) from one vendor., Company needs a large, multi-language development team where AI/ML is one of several needed capabilities. |
| Typical project type | Project-based | Dedicated team |
Addepto vs Andersen: pros and cons
| Addepto | |
|---|---|
| + | Press recognition from Forbes, Deloitte, and the Financial Times provides independent third-party validation beyond client testimonials. |
| + | Founder-led AI consulting model since 2018, prior to being acquired. |
| + | Now backed by KMS Technology's broader resources post-acquisition, which may add delivery capacity. |
| - | Acquired by KMS Technology in December 2025 — leadership continuity, pricing, and delivery-team stability during integration are unconfirmed. |
| - | Reported headcount varies significantly across sources (11–50 vs. 72), making current team size hard to pin down. |
| - | Recent acquisition means the company's standalone track record may not reflect how engagements are run going forward. |
| Andersen | |
|---|---|
| + | 3,600+ in-house experts across 20 office locations and 16 development centers gives it substantial delivery flexibility. |
| + | 17 years of company history (since 2007) with a broad, multi-language technology stack beyond AI alone. |
| + | AI-powered robotic integration line suggests genuine applied AI work beyond pure software consulting. |
| - | AI consulting and ML are a smaller practice within a much broader general software-engineering portfolio (.NET, Java, PHP, Go, mobile). |
| - | Reported HQ city varies between Warsaw and Krakow across sources — confirm the primary contracting entity. |
| - | At 3,600+ employees, clients should confirm they're assigned a genuinely AI-specialized pod, not general developers relabeled for the engagement. |
Who should choose Addepto?
Addepto is the right choice for companies seeking a Forbes/Deloitte-recognized AI consultancy, provided they factor in post-acquisition integration risk..
AI consulting boutique with third-party press recognition (Forbes, Deloitte, Financial Times), now part of KMS Technology.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in FinTech, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce.
Who should choose Andersen?
Andersen is the right choice for enterprises wanting AI consulting bundled with a very broad general software-engineering practice (.NET, Java, mobile, etc.)..
3,600+ in-house experts across 20 office locations, giving it exceptional breadth across programming languages and delivery models.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in FinTech, Healthcare, Retail & E-commerce, Manufacturing.
Decision matrix: Addepto vs Andersen
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Andersen |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Addepto (Not published) vs Andersen (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Andersen |
| You need production MLOps support after model launch | Both offer MLOps support |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Addepto |
Use case fit: Addepto vs Andersen
| Use case | Addepto fit | Andersen fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Company wants an AI consultancy with independent press recognition for vendor due diligence. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Client is comfortable evaluating a firm mid-acquisition and confirming continuity directly before signing. | Strong | Limited | Addepto |
| Enterprise wants AI consulting bundled with broad general software engineering (.NET, Java, mobile) from one vendor. | Limited | Strong | Andersen |
| Company needs a large, multi-language development team where AI/ML is one of several needed capabilities. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-scope ML build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Ongoing model retraining | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Addepto vs Andersen
Addepto (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. AI consulting boutique with third-party press recognition (Forbes, Deloitte, Financial Times), now part of KMS Technology.. It is best for companies seeking a Forbes/Deloitte-recognized AI consultancy, provided they factor in post-acquisition integration risk..
Andersen (3.7/5) is the better choice when enterprises wanting AI consulting bundled with a very broad general software-engineering practice (.NET, Java, mobile, etc.).. If your situation matches those criteria, Andersen is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Addepto vs Andersen FAQ
Is Addepto better than Andersen?
Addepto (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Addepto is better for companies seeking a Forbes/Deloitte-recognized AI consultancy, provided they factor in post-acquisition integration risk.. Andersen is better for enterprises wanting AI consulting bundled with a very broad general software-engineering practice (.NET, Java, mobile, etc.)..
How do Addepto and Andersen differ in pricing?
Addepto uses project-based, consulting retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Andersen uses time & materials, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Addepto or Andersen?
Addepto is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Addepto and Andersen?
Addepto's primary differentiator is: ai consulting boutique with third-party press recognition (forbes, deloitte, financial times), now part of kms technology.. Andersen's primary differentiator is: 3,600+ in-house experts across 20 office locations, giving it exceptional breadth across programming languages and delivery models.. They also differ in team size (50–100 vs 3,600+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (FinTech, Manufacturing vs FinTech, Healthcare).
Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.